|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Composite"
defines a structure made from more than one material. Plywood
is a composite made of wood held together with adhesive. Concrete
is also a composite. |
|
|
Advanced composite is
a narrower term used to describe structures or parts that use
one of the four main reinforcements along with a resin: S glass,
Kevlar, carbon fiber and ceramics. Kevlar is a registered brand
of DuPont. Aramid is essentially the same as Kevlar but manufacturered
by another company. S glass is a variation of traditional fiberglass.
S-glass is stronger than E-glass (fiberglass) but not as strong
as the remaining fabrics. Kevlar has excellent abrasion resistance,
low CTE (coefficient of thermal expansion) and is the only fabric
that acts like a metal. This means that as Kevlar nears or exceeds
it's load limit, it will bend instead of fracture and shatter
apart like other advanced composite materials, especially carbon
fiber. Carbon fiber is stronger and stiffer than Kevlar. It is
also brittle compared to Kevlar. A composite of carbon fiber
can be engineered to be less brittle through various means however.
Ceramics are generally used for application that require the
part to be near or part of very high temperatures. Typically
this is 600F up to or past 3000F. The ceramic tiles on the underside
of the space shuttle are an example of ceramic's in action. |
|
|
Advanced composites combine
one or more reinforcement types with a resin (adhesive). Resins
come in hundreds of types but three main types are: polyester,
vinyl ester and epoxy. The first two have the typical "fiberglassing"
smell while epoxy has very little odor. They increase in strength
as listed, epoxy being the strongest, when used properly. Epoxy
has better stiction to most reinforcements as well. Epoxy normally
has higher inherent thermal properties too. Epoxy is typically
much more expensive than the other two types, costing $100 to
$250+ per gallon. This can be as much as 12-13 times more expensive
than a polyester resin. |
|
|
Careful consideration
needs to be applied when combining all of these raw materials
in combinations. Some materials will not work well with others.
Epoxy is almost always used with carbon fiber and Kevlar applications
where those fabrics are being used for their strength and rigidity.
The epoxy merely adds to the parts optimization characteristics.
Certain resins do not stick well to Kevlar and carbon fiber,
while most epoxies do very well. Polyester resins change shape
(slightly) as they cure. The use of carbon fiber is normally
in situations where low CTE and therefore very stable parts are
required. Polyester resin is therefore not a good choice in that
situation and is one reason so many carbon fiber parts use epoxy. |
|
|
Fiberglass fabrics are
generally white with a tinge of green to them. Kevlar is typically
yellow. Carbon fiber is normally charcoal black. Each of the
fabrics can be purchased in numerous "weights." This
describes, generally, the thickness of the fabric and size of
the weave pattern. There are dozens of main weave patterns from
plain weaves to twills to unidirectional fabrics. |
|
|
Unidirectional fabrics
are inherently much stronger than plain weave or even twill weaves,
in the longitudinal direction, because they have almost all of
their fibers running in one direction. This also means they are
much weaker in the opposite direction, perpindicular to their
long strands. Many applications will lay down multiple layers
of unidirectional fabric by varying the angle of each layer.
The inner most layer at 0 degrees, the next at 90 degrees and
the outermost layer at 0 degrees again. The final structure will
have more strength in the 0 degree direction, say the length
of the tube, but by adding the layer at 90 degrees (perpindicular
to the other two layers) it will have added strength in that
direction as well. This helps the tube resist compression (hoop
strength). |
|
|
You can tell from the
previous layup example that a part can be engineered by the fabrics
used and the direction in which the fabrics are laid up. In addition
to this design freedom there are also fabrication methods that
influence the final parts thickness, strength and overall characteristics. |
|
|
|
Hand-layup is describes
laying up fabric and wetting it out by hand. If no other heat
or pressure is being applied to the part, it leaves the thickest
wall for a given part because it has the highest amount of resin.
The strength of any part is in its fibers, not in the resin.
The exception to this being hand-lay up that does not employ
vacuum bagging, autoclave or some other form of force that helps
squeeze out excess resin. The more resin you have in a part,
the more your part will act like the properties of the resin,
instead of the fibers. The resin type does matter in numerous
ways, but lowering the resin content of the part will increase
the strength of the final part, generally much more than simply
using a "stronger" resin, like epoxy. |
|
|
Vacuum bagging is one
technique that applies vacuum pressure to the part. This compresses
the part, thus reducing the resin content, which makes it stronger.
The process also gets rid of air bubbles, moisture and pushes
the fibers closer together. Resins are heavy as well, so decreasing
the resin amount produces three main affects: the part's thickness is reduced, it has less resin which means it is lighter
and it is stronger because the fibers are closer together
and the strength is relying more on the strong fibers versus
relying on the weaker resin. |
|
|
|
Aerospace usually produces
parts with resin contents (by weight of the final part) anywhere
from 25% to 50%. |
|
|
|
Many aerospace companies
use a variation on vacuum bagging as well as applying heat to
the part. Many use autoclaves that generally mimic a pressure
cooker. The part is exposed to much higher forces (using pressure
as well as vacuum) than typical vacuum bagging alone can achieve.
This can reduce the resin amount even further than vacuum bagging
but more often it is done for other reasons. Those reasons can
include: consolidation, consistency, even forces over the entire
lay up (irregardless of the parts shape) and slightly reduced
expertise needed during lay up. Low resin contents can be achieved
with vacuum bagging alone. Dream has produced parts with
as low as 16.137% resin content (by weight) using E-glass and
vacuum bagging only. Autoclaves
are extremely expensive and therefore make the final products
produced with this technique also extremely expensive. There
are a few other techniques that can achieve pressures at or higher
than typical autoclaves. |
|
|
Autoclaves are typically
used in combination with prepregs. The purchaser buys the prepreg
with the resin already impregnated into the reinforcement. The
prepreg has been wet out with a smaller amount of resin than
(typical) hand-lay up would have. Many prepregs have higher resin
contents than vacuum bagging can achieve. Prepregs usually
contain around 40-60% resin (by weight). Although this is better
than hand-layup alone (without vacuum or pressure and for a typical
fabrication house), it is still a fairly high percentage. |
|
The resin is very evenly
applied. Prepregs also speed up production because a separate
worker does not have to mix the resin matrix while another wets
out the fabric. Many prepregs require refrigeration, so a walk-in
cooler is required to store the prepreg supply, near or below
40F. The prepreg material is laid up, bagged and then inserted
into the autoclave where it is exposed to the pressures and temperatures
mentioned above. The heat causes the resin matrix to react and
cure. |
|
|
|
Infusion is becoming more and more preferred by the
industry. You can see Dream's testing of the infusion technique
here. Although the technique
makes lay up and wetting out much easier, set up time is longer
and to date Dream has not been able to produce a fiberglass sample
panel with less than 28.5% resin by weight. Conventional vacuum
bagging techniques allow Dream to attain resin contents as low
as 16.137% with fiberglass, almost half that of infusion thus
far. Testing will continue. |
|
|
|
Filament winding is a
fabrication technique that is most easily described as a loom
combined with a CNC machine. Single or multiple tows (yarns)
are wound around a mandrel. The computer controls the pattern
the tow(s) make and the tows eventually make a "fabric"
or weave. Filament winding is most recognized by its diamond-like
pattern but there are many, many other patterns. This type of
manufacturing is expensive but offers a product that can be highly
engineered (by controlling the exact direction, placement of
each tow and fiber utilitized) and therefore stronger than typical
fabrication techniques using prepregs or wet lay up with vacuum
bagging. The tows are not crimped like they are in woven goods
either so they are inherently stronger than woven goods as well. |
|
|
|
Pultrusion is yet another
fabrication technique. Pultrusion is akin to Playdo being pushed
through a template. It will take on the shape of that template.
As it comes out the other side of the template it is exposed
to controlled heat. This rapidly cures the part. So quickly that
after passing out of the heating chamber it is fully cured and
solid. It is most often used for small diameter tubes in varying
profiles. From round to square to "I" beam shapes.
Normally pultrusion tubes are not available in sizes larger than
4-5 inches in diameter. They can be done but price jumps exponentially
as sizes go larger and larger. Smaller sizes, 1/2" diameter
and less, can be very reasonable in all materials (fiberglass
or carbon fiber) but as sizes rise past 1/2" OD, the costs
jump considerably. The poles used for most tents are pultruded
carbon fiber tubes. All of the fibers are longitudinal and have
enormous strength in the axial direction. Transverse or hoop
strength is very low though. |
|
|
|
|